Russian for Dummies (or how many words do you have to learn to become a Russia “expert”)? - Instablogs
Russian for Dummies (or how many words do you have to learn to become a Russia “expert”)?
Eugene Ivanov , Boston: Jun 2 2008
Made Popular Jun 3 2008
Russia :

Conventional wisdom holds that the Russian language consists of about half million words, with roughly 150,000 of them listed in the multi-volume Large Academic Dictionary.Russian for Dummies (or how many words do you have to learn to become a Russia “expert”)?

Naturally, no one uses such a monstrous vocabulary. A record seems to belong to the titan of the Russian literature, Aleksandr Pushkin, whose poems and prose reportedly utilized 24,000 words.Russian for Dummies (or how many words do you have to learn to become a Russia “expert”)?

The rest of us settle for much less: it’s believed that one needs no more than 1,500 words to read Russian and about 400-500 words to maintain common conversation.

For some, that number still might appear like a lot. But this is only if you want to speak and read “regular” Russian. However, if your goal is more ambitious, that is, if you want to become a Russia “expert”, then all you need to learn is three words.

The first word is “gulag.” This word, introduced to the world by the Nobel Price winner, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, describes the elaborate system of labor camps used to repress political opposition in Stalin’s Soviet Union. By some accounts, more than 18 million people passed trough Gulag from 1929 to 1953; many of them have perished due to inhuman conditions of malnutrition and hard labor.Russian for Dummies (or how many words do you have to learn to become a Russia “expert”)?

But this is not how Russia “experts” use the word. They invoke “gulag” every time when a mentally-disturbed street hooligan, calling himself “democrat”, gets arrested for the violation of public order. I already profiled one of the contemporary “gulag victims”, Oleg Kozlovsky, on the Instablogs. The only objective Russia “experts” seems to pursue by elevating pathetic clowns like Kozlovsky to the status of Gulag martyrs is to desecrate the memories of innocent victims of Stalin’s terror.

The second word is “K.G.B.”Russian for Dummies (or how many words do you have to learn to become a Russia “expert”)? Never mind that K.G.B. doesn’t exist: in 1991, it was split into FSB (Federal Security Service) and SVR (Foreign Intelligence Service). But for Russia “experts” it doesn’t matter, for they use “K.G.B.” as a symbol by putting the “K.G.B.” label on everything they don’t understand or dislike.

This is very convenient: you call something or someone “K.G.B.”, and that’s it. Everyone gets it: it’s evil. No further explanation is needed.

That’s why Russia “experts” love so much the phrase: “President Putin, a former K.G.B. spy…” You say that and any discussion of Putin’s policies becomes meaningless. What’s there to discuss if he’s K.G.B.?

(I wonder why no one ever uses the phrase “President Bush, a former alcoholic…”?)

There is another usage of “K.G.B.”, usually in the context of a “K.G.B. man.” When Russia “experts” have nothing to say on the substance – which happens all the time –they use this phrase to slander their opponents. A fellow Citizen Journalist, for example, called me “K.G.B. man” when she didn’t like my post.

The third word is “Putin.” I already wrote on my blog that the obsession of Russia “experts” with Vladimir Putin is mind-boggling; I even suspect there is something sexual here.Russian for Dummies (or how many words do you have to learn to become a Russia “expert”)?

But not dissimilar to “K.G.B.”, Russia “experts” rarely apply “Putin” to a concrete person. Rather, they use the word in almost supernatural sense — to describe the origin of all “evil” in the world.

It would seem that since the election of Dmitry Medvedev president of Russia, the word “Medvedev” should gradually replace “Putin” in the lexicon of Russia “experts.” Not so fast. Medvedev was born after Gulag has ceased to exist and he has no K.G.B. connections. By the very virtue of his background, Medvedev is challenging the sacredness of the “gulag-K.G.B.-Putin” axes of evil. Russian for Dummies (or how many words do you have to learn to become a Russia “expert”)?

Besides, compared to a simple, two-syllable “Putin”, three-syllable “Medvedev” with an awkward run of “d” and “v’” is difficult to learn. If a leading U.S. presidential candidate struggles to pronounce Medvedev’s name, what do you expect from Russia “experts” who are so busy writing multiple blogs that they have no time – nor desire or skills – to do their home work?

Oh yes, to become a Russia “expert”, you should also learn a few accessory words, usually semi-profanities. Russia “experts” use them to “argue” with their opponents. Here is a sample of those: “illiterate moron”, “Kremlin shill”, “very bad liar”, and (my favorite) “Kremlin’s nasty little insect.”

However, if you choose to learn “normal” Russian, rest your soul with a Pushkin’s jewel. It’s beautiful, even in English:

I remember a wonderful moment
As before my eyes you appeared,
Like a vision, fleeting, momentary,
Like a spirit of the purest beauty.

(“To A. P. Kern”)Russian for Dummies (or how many words do you have to learn to become a Russia “expert”)?

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
1 Stars
Harshpaul
shimla, India
Nice article. I’m an expert on Russia now. Here’s a sample:

KGB and Putin with Gulag.

Good enough? ;)
1 Stars
Kim publiuspundit.com/
New York, United States
The attentive reader can’t help but notice two key differences between the author of this post and Oleg Kozlovsky (mentioned in the text):

(1) The Washington Post, one of the world’s leading newspapers, is very interested in publishing Kozlovsky’s writing. It has no interest whatsoever in this author (nor, for that matter, do many others).

(2) Kozlovsky lives in Russia, facing the reality of life there and risking everything to make his country better. The author of this post, by contrast, doesn’t do either of those things.

To learn more about Kozlovsky, check out his English-language blog:

http://olegkozlovsky.wordpress.com/
1 Stars
Dear Harsh,

Thank you very much for your comment.

You got it! And I hope it hasn’t escaped your attention that by simply changing the order of the words, you can make your ”analysis” even more sophisticated ;)

Good luck and don’t neglect using ”accessory” words I mentioned at the end. They’ll help you look sharp.

Best Regards,
Eugene
2 Stars
Hi Kim,

Thanks for your comment. Haven’t read your WP articles, either. So we’re on completely equal footing here.

Regards,
Eugene
1 Stars
Kim publiuspundit.com/
New York, United States
EUGENE:

Your brain needs serious work. My writing expresses admiration for Kozlovsky doing something I haven’t done. I’m the first to admit he’s on a far higher level than I am, and to praise him to the skies for it. You, on the other hand, attack him as if it was you who stood above — a laughably transparent falsehood. Do you think at all before you formulate your ”responses”?

Do you really need two comments to respond to my one? Thanks for the compliment!

PS: Your jealousy is showing, you nasty little KGB collaborator. Next time, try to hide it a bit better, if only for the sake of appearances.
1 Stars
Iuppiter iratus ergo nefas (Jupiter, you’re angry therefore you’re wrong).

Kim, just keep doing your home work: this is the cure for many world’s diseases.

Regards,
Eugene
1 Stars
Denis
Moscow, Russia
There are times when you feel that you need to say something but you don't seem to have the right words to articulate it. With this post Eugene Ivanov has cleared one such thing that I have always wanted to say. Three words that is to become a Russian expert - Gulad, KGB and Putin.

Washington Post wanted a sensational article, Kozlovsky gave them one. WP is not above journalism that has shades of yellow.

Eugene should learn how not to react to Kim's comments for she has exposed herself and her designs here long back. Just enjoy her rants.
1 Stars
Kim publiuspundit.com/
New York, United States
EUGENE:

As I know you love research, I’ve done a bit to compare our writing on this blog.
In our most recent four posts, I’ve received 47 stars while you’ve received only 35. Other than comments from you and me on those posts, I’ve received 19 comments while you’ve received only 6. My tenure on this blog is also far longer and more substantial than yours.

Comparing our two personal blogs, I have ten times more traffic and linking blogs than you do, and that’s just considering the smallest of my two personal blogs.

So I’d say that, as a matter of scientific fact, my achievements are far greater than yours and we are not, in fact, equal at all as bloggers. Accordingly, I assume you’ll remember that the next time you address me. To date, your manner of address has been haughty and totally detached from reality.
1 Stars
Yash
Gwalior, India
Hey Eugene,

I am a Russia expert too! I just realised I had been one since I was in lower primary school. I didn't hear of Putin then, but I did hear of General Secretary Yuri Andropov (ex-KGB man like Putin), Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's The Gulag Archipelago and of course the KGB.

Going by that how many Russian experts might we have in the world now? Tens of millions perhaps? Kim, you and of course me are just three of them.

Good isn't it?
1 Stars
Hi Denis,

Thanks for your nice comment.

I’m actually not sure that Kozlovsky has anything to do with the WP piece at all except for giving his name to it, but this is completely moot point. Nothing in the WP coverage of Russia can surprise me anymore.

However, I have to disagree with you on my reaction to Kim’s comments. I DO enjoy her rants, and the best way of having more of them is to always comment.
1 Stars
Kim wrote:

”In our most recent four posts, I’ve received 47 stars while you’ve received only 35.”

I suspect you’re using your editor status to assign additional stars to your posts.

Just kidding...

Regards,
Eugene
Add your Comment