There is a funny-sounding Russian word, “fufloh.” It could be translated in English as “junk”, “crap”, or “rubbish.” In addition, “fufloh” wears a scent of falsification; in colloquial Russian, “fufloh” equals to “pulling a fast one.”
Fufloh is the best word to describe the Washington Post’s “coverage” of Russia of late.
In May, this flagship of American journalism offered its space to a Oleg Kozlovsky, a petty criminal who calls himself a “pro-democracy advocate.” There was nothing remarkable in delusional Kozlovsky’s babbling except for his claim that he wrote his Post piece when sitting in prison.
The image of a “pro-democracy advocate” writing articles in a Russian pen was so incredible that one of the Instablogs’ Citizen Journalists rushed to the rescue. We were told that in fact, Kozlovsky wrote the article weeks before he was arrested. Post’s editors just “published” it when he was in prison. Nice try. The truth is that Kozlovsky never wrote anything for the Post. He simply “donated” his name, and his Post’s handlers did the writing.
Typical fufloh.
Last weekend, the Post added yet another masterpiece to its Russian collection. It published an article allegedly authored by a Julia Latynina described as a Russian journalist and novelist. A journalist Ms. Latynina is not, unless you call “journalism” a compilation of second-hand rumors and sultry gossips. A better word to describe the new Post star is storyteller. And, boy, stories she tells!
Ms. Latynina brings us to the upper echelons of Russian society populated by “ministers, their wives and their children.” Added to the mix are “their lovers, … high-priced prostitutes, high on cocaine.” (Ms. Latynina obviously knows that sex and drugs sell, even at the Post!).
Here is my favorite story:
“On a rainy September evening…, I witnessed an accident on Moscow’s government thoroughfare – the famous Kutuzovsky Prospect. A silver Lexus, traveling at what looked to be about 90 miles an hour, flew out of the far left lane and crossed four lanes of oncoming traffic, crashing into several cars.”

Wait a minute! Everyone who has visited Moscow at least once over the past few years knows that the city is a brutal traffic nightmare. And Ms. Latynina wants us to believe that during evening commute hours, a car travels through downtown Moscow at 90 miles an hour? Perhaps, not. Most likely, she meant 90 kilometers an hour (although this still sounds incredible), but the Post’s “assistant editor Zofia Smardz” who “translated” the story from Russian didn’t know the difference. Smells fufloh, doesn’t it?
But let the story continue:
“Within the hour, I learned that the driver of the Lexus was a 27-year-old woman with no known occupation.
(This is how politically correct Zofia Smardz translated “high-priced prostitute, high on cocaine”.)
With her in the car was a deputy minister of economic development.”
A friend of Ms. Latynina (she always has “friends” to help her create her fascinating stories) rushed to the scene, but it was too late:
“The minister was already dead.”
“The minister”? Only an hour ago, this unfortunate gentleman was “a deputy minister”? Those crazy Russians! They promoted the guy to the minister of economic development while he was dying in the car accident caused by a “woman with no known occupation.”
Typical fufloh.
Back in September 2007, the post of the minister of economic development was occupied by German Gref, who’s alive and well and is currently the president of Russia’s Sberbank. A careful examination of the list of 30 past and present deputy ministers of economic development (26 males and 4 females) reveals no one whose tenure was terminated in September 2007. But should this fact prevent the Post’s editors from telling a good story?
There seems to be another way of translating “fufloh” in English: F-rated journalism.
Thank you very much for your comment.
Sure, Kozlovsky can get asylum here in the U.S. But ”money and luxury”? Who needs him outside Russia with his cheap anti-Putin/Medvedev propaganda? He’ll end up in McDonald’s or, worse, on living assistance — paid by taxpayers like myself.
Regards,
Eugene
Thanks for your comment. I must say that I admire your dry, if somewhat cynic, wit.
Wanna split the difference? I admit that I’m ”a neo-Soviet thug” but you drop the claim that I’m ”in the payroll of Putin.” Deal?
Cheers,
Eugene
http://kimzigfeld.instablogs.com/entry/eugene-ivanov-is-telling-lies-on-instablogs/
Mr. Ivanov does all of us here on Instblogs a great disservice by circulating these mendacious lies and exposes us to a serious risk of liability.
That’s to say nothing, of course, of his libelous personal statements for which he provides no details, as you properly note, much less any source material. Even more hypocrisy! Pot calling the kettle black!
Thank you for your comment.
Common dictionaries define ”criminal” as ”someone who has committed a crime or has been legally convicted of a crime.” There is absolutely no reason to look for some sophisticated SOURCES to call Kozlovsky a criminal. Just read what he says about himself in his WP piece which I quote and give a link to:
”At age 23, I have been arrested more than a dozen times, have twice served short terms in prison.”
Now, I understand that he’s not a serious threat to the society. That’s why I call him ”petty criminal.”
If you want to learn more about Kozlovsky, you have a plenty of resources. My post was about the Post’s coverage of Russia.
Regards,
Eugene
I really liked the article as it makes us aware how people lie to mold the truth just to make their point valid.
It is possible that the author of this article may be lieing, but I can’t straight away refute it be believing that as the Post is a very famous one the editor can’t be wrong or lieing.
If you believe the author if this article is lying, you should demand he tells the truth. If we don’t have the truth, we have nothing and nobody will rely on us. We will get a bad reputation and soon become insignificant. If we have no standards we are worthless.
Mr. Ivanov is demanding fair and balanced reporting on Russia from the Washington post, yet he’s not delivering it. He’s demanding accuracy, yet he’s not delivering it. That’s hypocrisy, pure and simple.
If anyone pointed out a factual error in my reporting, I would immediately apologize and correct it. Has Mr. Ivanov done so here? You can see he hasn’t.
http://eivanov.instablogs.com/entry/fufloh-or-how-the-washington-post-covers-russia/#comment-505490
The ONLY evidence he has is MR. KOZLOVSKY’S OWN STATEMENT regarding has arrests FOR CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE.
Gandhi also was arrested many times for civil disobedience. Will Instablogs allow him to be defamed as a ”petty criminal” because of that? OF COURSE NOT! Nor would we allow Martin Luther King to be called a ”petty criminal.”
Mr. Kozlovsky has NEVER been arrested for ANY ”petty crime” but ONLY for civil disobedience, appearing at a protest demonstration and refusing to leave when ordered by the police, just like Gandhi.
Mr. Ivanov must retract and apologize. His behavior is every bit as bad as that of the Post he claims to be criticizing!
That’s a lie. He has no evidence of it, and Latynina did not say so. The accident has been independently reported to have occurred exactly as she says it did; she never said it happened at any particular time of day. Mr. Ivanov simply invented that information (he provides NO source for it) in order to smear her with lies.
http://www.topix.com/content/trb/2008/01/russia-stepping-up-intimidation-of-young-dissidents
Are they also incompetent like the Washington Post?
Now, I understand that he’s not a serious threat to the society. That’s why I call him ”petty criminal.”
I can't stop laughing. Yes, yes I know what exactly you meant by using the phrase 'petty criminal' in your post. It meant beyond the dictionary and your own explanation why you used the words 'petty' and 'criminal'. The real intention and the court argument is not lost here. :)
Mr. Ivanov himself claims KOZLOVSKY DIDN’T EVEN WRITE THAT ARTICLE.
And Mr. Ivanov claims that the Post’s editors are incompetent and circulating lies about Russia.
THEN WHY DOES HE BELIEVE THIS STATEMENT ABOUT KOZLOVSKY?
Mr. Ivanov must answer.
I agree with you that Russia has gone wrong... but why do you lose yourself so much over over small things.
On the other hand I believe that by questioning the veracity of the post itself .. you have proved that the author is right. Come on .. you won’t shouting that on the post it was written that on a particular date there was this day... if author questioned the post .. it doesn’t mean that everything in it is wrong...
Maybe you have your reasons to be angry with Russia, but don’t stop being intelligent because of your anger .
I don’t think you read this post very carefully. It’s called ”How the Washington Post Covers Russia.” It’s not talking about one small error in one article, but about a general pattern of alleged conspiracy against Russia and/or incompetence.
If someone wrote that YOU were a ”petty criminal” how would YOU like it?
The truth is that both Washington Post and the New York Post are no different from each other apart from their ideological inclinations. That doesn't take away the fact that both are good or bad or above yellow journalism. The piece on Kozlovsky in the Washington Post is a prime example of yellow journalism.
My post is not about Kozlovsky or Latynina; it’s about the Post’s ”coverage” of Russia (and I totally agree with Craig that the NYT isn’t any better).
There are many intelligent people in Russia including those in opposition to the current regime. However, of all possibilities, the Post has chosen these two: a petty criminal and a lier.
So much for the ”one of the world’s leading newspapers.”
Thanks to everyone who contributed.
Regards,
Eugene
The Chicago Tribune has also printed a story about Kozlovsky:
http://www.topix.com/content/trb/2008/01/russia-stepping-up-intimidation-of-young-dissidents
Are they also involved in this massive conspiracy against Russia?
The Post article discussed here was not ON Kozlovsky it was WRITTEN BY KOZLOVSKY. It was an op-ed article in which he gave his opinions about democracy in Russia.
Your ideas about liberal and conservative are a bit confused. Liberals should be far more outraged by the lack of liberal democracy in Russia than conservatives. Left-wing groups like Amnesty International are the leaders in criticizing Putin, and the New York Times has published editorials harshly criticizing him, including one called ”kicking the corpse of democracy.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/30/opinion/30wed4.html?_r=1&ref=opinion&oref=slogin
You really should be more careful before making such irresponsible statements.
How would YOU like it if someone on this blog published a post about YOU calling you a ”petty criminal” because you’d been arrested while protesting for an end to the war in Iraq. Would you approve of it?
Fufloh or flip flop Eugene?
Craig might be a bit confused about liberals and conservatives when it comes to desiring who runs Russia. Therefore let me suggest something that might appeal to both the liberals and the conservatives about having the perfect government in Russia.
How does the name Liberal Democratic Party of Russia sound headed by a certain leader called Vladimir Zhirinovsky. A far better choice than Vladimir Putin of course, right?
What say Eugene?
I felt I was done with this post and comments, but you really surprised me. It’s not that often that people outside Russia know what LDPR is and can spell Zhirinovsky’s name.
No, I wouldn’t recommend Zhirinovsky as Putin’s replacement for the same reason I don’t want McCain becoming our next president: too old and too hot-headed.
However, Zhirinovsky isn’t such a clown he’s always portraited in the West. On the contrary, I consider him as one of the most — if not THE most — gifted and experienced Russian politicians, including Putin.
I don’t want to take space for the subject most of the Instablogs readers aren’t really interested in. Sometime ago, I wrote a piece on LDPR for the Johnson’s Russia List:
http://www.cdi.org/russia/johnson/9126-20.cfm
It’s already somewhat outdated, of course, but, hopefully, will give you a sense of what LDPR and Zhirinovsky are all about.
Naturally, feel free to contact me off-line with questions/comments.
Best Regards,
Eugene
I wonder what Americans would say if come this September he has discovered fraud in Barack Obama’s nomination materials and strikes him from the ballot, leaving John McCain to run against Ralph Nader.
Hmmm . . .
”If anyone pointed out a factual error in my reporting, I would immediately apologize and correct it.”
http://eivanov.instablogs.com/entry/fufloh-or-how-the-washington-post-covers-russia/#comment-505494
Are you going to apologize and correct?
Vikas Shekhawat
Editor-in-Chief
Instablogs News Network
Instablogs has now deleted Mr. Ivanov’s statement about Mr. Kozlovsky being a ”petty criminal” after an investigation concluded it was irresponsibly false.
The above statement by member and contributor Kim Zigfeld is absolutely false and baseless. As Shri V. Shekhawat has clarified above, Instablogs shall not encourage propaganda posts by featuring them on the homepage.
Members are requested to refrain from launching personal attacks on other members and contributors. Name calling and abusive language shall not be tolerated at any cost.
Jayanta Bhattacharya
Founding Editor
Instablogs News Network.
Home


RSS 












Thank you very much for your nice comment. Truth be told, Russia is a big and ”difficult” country. It’s easy to criticize it; I do it often on my blog. However, one has to stick to some basic standards — if not of objectivity, then at least of common decency.
The WP simply fails to do either.
Regards,
Eugene