Fufloh, or how the Washington Post 'covers' Russia - Instablogs
Fufloh, or how the Washington Post 'covers' Russia
Eugene Ivanov , Boston: Jun 29 2008
Made Popular Jun 29 2008
Russia :

There is a funny-sounding Russian word, “fufloh.” It could be translated in English as “junk”, “crap”, or “rubbish.” In addition, “fufloh” wears a scent of falsification; in colloquial Russian, “fufloh” equals to “pulling a fast one.”

Fufloh is the best word to describe the Washington Post’s “coverage” of Russia of late.

In May, this flagship of American journalism offered its space to a Oleg Kozlovsky, a petty criminal who calls himself a “pro-democracy advocate.” There was nothing remarkable in delusional Kozlovsky’s babbling except for his claim that he wrote his Post piece when sitting in prison.

The image of a “pro-democracy advocate” writing articles in a Russian pen was so incredible that one of the Instablogs’ Citizen Journalists rushed to the rescue. We were told that in fact, Kozlovsky wrote the article weeks before he was arrested. Post’s editors just “published” it when he was in prison. Nice try. The truth is that Kozlovsky never wrote anything for the Post. He simply “donated” his name, and his Post’s handlers did the writing.

Typical fufloh.

Last weekend, the Post added yet another masterpiece to its Russian collection. It published an article allegedly authored by a Julia Latynina described as a Russian journalist and novelist. A journalist Ms. Latynina is not, unless you call “journalism” a compilation of second-hand rumors and sultry gossips. A better word to describe the new Post star is storyteller. And, boy, stories she tells!

Ms. Latynina brings us to the upper echelons of Russian society populated by “ministers, their wives and their children.” Added to the mix are “their lovers, … high-priced prostitutes, high on cocaine.” (Ms. Latynina obviously knows that sex and drugs sell, even at the Post!).

Here is my favorite story:

“On a rainy September evening…, I witnessed an accident on Moscow’s government thoroughfare – the famous Kutuzovsky Prospect. A silver Lexus, traveling at what looked to be about 90 miles an hour, flew out of the far left lane and crossed four lanes of oncoming traffic, crashing into several cars.”

Fufloh, or how the Washington Post 'covers' Russia

Wait a minute! Everyone who has visited Moscow at least once over the past few years knows that the city is a brutal traffic nightmare. And Ms. Latynina wants us to believe that during evening commute hours, a car travels through downtown Moscow at 90 miles an hour? Perhaps, not. Most likely, she meant 90 kilometers an hour (although this still sounds incredible), but the Post’s “assistant editor Zofia Smardz” who “translated” the story from Russian didn’t know the difference. Smells fufloh, doesn’t it?

But let the story continue:

“Within the hour, I learned that the driver of the Lexus was a 27-year-old woman with no known occupation.

(This is how politically correct Zofia Smardz translated “high-priced prostitute, high on cocaine”.)

With her in the car was a deputy minister of economic development.”

A friend of Ms. Latynina (she always has “friends” to help her create her fascinating stories) rushed to the scene, but it was too late:

“The minister was already dead.”

“The minister”? Only an hour ago, this unfortunate gentleman was “a deputy minister”? Those crazy Russians! They promoted the guy to the minister of economic development while he was dying in the car accident caused by a “woman with no known occupation.”

Typical fufloh.

Back in September 2007, the post of the minister of economic development was occupied by German Gref, who’s alive and well and is currently the president of Russia’s Sberbank. A careful examination of the list of 30 past and present deputy ministers of economic development (26 males and 4 females) reveals no one whose tenure was terminated in September 2007. But should this fact prevent the Post’s editors from telling a good story?

There seems to be another way of translating “fufloh” in English: F-rated journalism.

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
4 Stars
Doru
Bucharest, Romania
This is an incredible story Eugene. I never expected that someone here in Instablogs would come out with such a huge and authenticated refutation of what the real scenario is with respect to Russia and the propaganda against it, especially in the light that a writer with no background is running amok with his/her electronic vandalism here. Thanks a lot.
1 Stars
Dear Doru,

Thank you very much for your nice comment. Truth be told, Russia is a big and ”difficult” country. It’s easy to criticize it; I do it often on my blog. However, one has to stick to some basic standards — if not of objectivity, then at least of common decency.

The WP simply fails to do either.

Regards,
Eugene
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Rada
Sofia, Bulgaria
Of course Oleg Kozlovsky is a thug and a cheap prank who attempted to gain some media publicity especially in the West with his antics. He can now seriously hope that the West gives him asylum and the money and luxury that he tends to achieve by fraud and deceit.
1 Stars
Dear Sofia,

Thank you very much for your comment.

Sure, Kozlovsky can get asylum here in the U.S. But ”money and luxury”? Who needs him outside Russia with his cheap anti-Putin/Medvedev propaganda? He’ll end up in McDonald’s or, worse, on living assistance — paid by taxpayers like myself.

Regards,
Eugene
(Global Perspectives)
2 Stars
John
London, United Kingdom
Good post and you did well to uncover a few myths and falsehoods that had been circulating in the Western media for quite sometime now. Though I suspect you to be a neo-Soviet thug in the payrolls of Putin, I must say that you have done an admirable job with this post. This would make the anti-Russians think and counter you with thought. Good job over all.
2 Stars
Dear John,

Thanks for your comment. I must say that I admire your dry, if somewhat cynic, wit.

Wanna split the difference? I admit that I’m ”a neo-Soviet thug” but you drop the claim that I’m ”in the payroll of Putin.” Deal?

Cheers,
Eugene
(Global Perspectives)
0 Stars
Kim publiuspundit.com/
New York, United States
This post is false to the extent of libel as I document here:

http://kimzigfeld.instablogs.com/entry/eugene-ivanov-is-telling-lies-on-instablogs/

Mr. Ivanov does all of us here on Instblogs a great disservice by circulating these mendacious lies and exposes us to a serious risk of liability.
2 Stars
Taylor Flatt pceverything.org
Petersburg, United States
I don’t believe, unless he is working for instablogs, that it would look bad for the whole community as long as some investigation was conducted into the sources used. But I do not believe that other users, no affiliated with him, would lose creditability. But anything false should be reported, but I’m not an expert in this field so I leave this to others.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Kim publiuspundit.com/
New York, United States
The problem is that HE HAS NO SOURCES. He has accused someone of being a petty criminal and publishing by fraud WITH NO EVIDENCE AT ALL. Just look at his post. There are no links to other published reports and no source material is named. It’s the worst kind of yellow journalism.
(Global Perspectives)
3 Stars
Jaiyant Cavale
Bangalore, India
Mr. Ivanov, I agree that media is usually one sided, especially so in the West. I’m really curious to know more about this Mr. Kozlovsky and what petty crimes he committed. I”m not being sarcastic but we need to know right? I reiterate that I share your opinions about the one sided, sometimes unethical way of coverage of most stories. It is not only the ’Washington Post’ but most traditional media are biased. What we make out of this fantastic clutter depends on our intelligence. And yes, Russia is a large country with a complex social and political situation. And when things go wrong in Russia, they really go wrong.
1 Stars
Kim publiuspundit.com/
New York, United States
Jaiyant, wouldn’t you agree that Mr. Ivanov’s post is just as one-sided as he claims the Post is? Does he say ANYTHING positive about the newspaper or its columnists? I don’t see a single word recognizing any strength of either column he discusses. Seems to me, that’s the height of hypocrisy.

That’s to say nothing, of course, of his libelous personal statements for which he provides no details, as you properly note, much less any source material. Even more hypocrisy! Pot calling the kettle black!
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Dear Mr. Cavale,

Thank you for your comment.

Common dictionaries define ”criminal” as ”someone who has committed a crime or has been legally convicted of a crime.” There is absolutely no reason to look for some sophisticated SOURCES to call Kozlovsky a criminal. Just read what he says about himself in his WP piece which I quote and give a link to:

”At age 23, I have been arrested more than a dozen times, have twice served short terms in prison.”

Now, I understand that he’s not a serious threat to the society. That’s why I call him ”petty criminal.”

If you want to learn more about Kozlovsky, you have a plenty of resources. My post was about the Post’s coverage of Russia.

Regards,
Eugene
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Arjun
NCR, India
Hey Kim, you also outrightly blast Russia. As if it doesn’t have any good things also; so by extending your logic should we believe that yo are also at pinnacle of hypocrisy.

I really liked the article as it makes us aware how people lie to mold the truth just to make their point valid.

It is possible that the author of this article may be lieing, but I can’t straight away refute it be believing that as the Post is a very famous one the editor can’t be wrong or lieing.
2 Stars
Kim publiuspundit.com/
New York, United States
Arjun:

If you believe the author if this article is lying, you should demand he tells the truth. If we don’t have the truth, we have nothing and nobody will rely on us. We will get a bad reputation and soon become insignificant. If we have no standards we are worthless.

Mr. Ivanov is demanding fair and balanced reporting on Russia from the Washington post, yet he’s not delivering it. He’s demanding accuracy, yet he’s not delivering it. That’s hypocrisy, pure and simple.

If anyone pointed out a factual error in my reporting, I would immediately apologize and correct it. Has Mr. Ivanov done so here? You can see he hasn’t.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Kim publiuspundit.com/
New York, United States
Mr. Ivanov has now ADMITTED he has NO EVIDENCE that Mr. Kozlovsky is a ”petty criminal.”

http://eivanov.instablogs.com/entry/fufloh-or-how-the-washington-post-covers-russia/#comment-505490

The ONLY evidence he has is MR. KOZLOVSKY’S OWN STATEMENT regarding has arrests FOR CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE.

Gandhi also was arrested many times for civil disobedience. Will Instablogs allow him to be defamed as a ”petty criminal” because of that? OF COURSE NOT! Nor would we allow Martin Luther King to be called a ”petty criminal.”

Mr. Kozlovsky has NEVER been arrested for ANY ”petty crime” but ONLY for civil disobedience, appearing at a protest demonstration and refusing to leave when ordered by the police, just like Gandhi.

Mr. Ivanov must retract and apologize. His behavior is every bit as bad as that of the Post he claims to be criticizing!
0 Stars
Kim publiuspundit.com/
New York, United States
Mr. Ivanov claims that the car accident happened ”during evening commute hours.”

That’s a lie. He has no evidence of it, and Latynina did not say so. The accident has been independently reported to have occurred exactly as she says it did; she never said it happened at any particular time of day. Mr. Ivanov simply invented that information (he provides NO source for it) in order to smear her with lies.
1 Stars
Kim publiuspundit.com/
New York, United States
Oleg Kozlovsky is a graduate student at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow. He just finished his Masters degree in political science and has begun work on a PhD. He is not a ”petty criminal.” That’s a lie. The Chicago Tribune has also written about Kozlovsky’s heroic protest work:

http://www.topix.com/content/trb/2008/01/russia-stepping-up-intimidation-of-young-dissidents

Are they also incompetent like the Washington Post?
0 Stars
Kim publiuspundit.com/
New York, United States
Read the truth about Mr. Kozlovsky on his blog:

http://olegkozlovsky.wordpress.com/
1 Stars
Kim publiuspundit.com/
New York, United States
If you read Mr. Kozlovsky’s blog, you will see him explain how he and other members of his organization have been arrested at political demonstrations and often ON THEIR WAY to them, preemptively, before ever arriving. You will see how he explains the totally bogus nature of the charges and the various forms of harassment he has received as the result of demonstrating for democracy in Russia. It’s simply outrageous that Mr. Ivanov ignores all this first-hand information when reporting about Kozlovsky, and it’s libelous.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Neha
Gandhinagar, India
Eugene Ivanov --
Now, I understand that he’s not a serious threat to the society. That’s why I call him ”petty criminal.”


I can't stop laughing. Yes, yes I know what exactly you meant by using the phrase 'petty criminal' in your post. It meant beyond the dictionary and your own explanation why you used the words 'petty' and 'criminal'. The real intention and the court argument is not lost here. :)
1 Stars
Kim publiuspundit.com/
New York, United States
Isn’t it rather ironic that the ONLY source Mr. Ivanov has about Mr. Kozlovsky being a ”petty criminal” IS THE WASHINGTON POST ARTICLE ITSELF?

Mr. Ivanov himself claims KOZLOVSKY DIDN’T EVEN WRITE THAT ARTICLE.

And Mr. Ivanov claims that the Post’s editors are incompetent and circulating lies about Russia.

THEN WHY DOES HE BELIEVE THIS STATEMENT ABOUT KOZLOVSKY?

Mr. Ivanov must answer.
1 Stars
Arjun
NCR, India
Kim
I agree with you that Russia has gone wrong... but why do you lose yourself so much over over small things.

On the other hand I believe that by questioning the veracity of the post itself .. you have proved that the author is right. Come on .. you won’t shouting that on the post it was written that on a particular date there was this day... if author questioned the post .. it doesn’t mean that everything in it is wrong...

Maybe you have your reasons to be angry with Russia, but don’t stop being intelligent because of your anger .
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Kim publiuspundit.com/
New York, United States
ARJUN:

I don’t think you read this post very carefully. It’s called ”How the Washington Post Covers Russia.” It’s not talking about one small error in one article, but about a general pattern of alleged conspiracy against Russia and/or incompetence.

If someone wrote that YOU were a ”petty criminal” how would YOU like it?
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Craig
Pretoria, South Africa
The Washington Post had always been a conservative entity, hence it is one of the world's leading newspapers and New York Times is just toilet tissue for Kim naturally.

The truth is that both Washington Post and the New York Post are no different from each other apart from their ideological inclinations. That doesn't take away the fact that both are good or bad or above yellow journalism. The piece on Kozlovsky in the Washington Post is a prime example of yellow journalism.
1 Stars
Now that one of the commenters seems to have completed a shouting match with herself, let me summarize.

My post is not about Kozlovsky or Latynina; it’s about the Post’s ”coverage” of Russia (and I totally agree with Craig that the NYT isn’t any better).

There are many intelligent people in Russia including those in opposition to the current regime. However, of all possibilities, the Post has chosen these two: a petty criminal and a lier.

So much for the ”one of the world’s leading newspapers.”

Thanks to everyone who contributed.

Regards,
Eugene
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Kim publiuspundit.com/
New York, United States
CRAIG:

The Chicago Tribune has also printed a story about Kozlovsky:

http://www.topix.com/content/trb/2008/01/russia-stepping-up-intimidation-of-young-dissidents

Are they also involved in this massive conspiracy against Russia?

The Post article discussed here was not ON Kozlovsky it was WRITTEN BY KOZLOVSKY. It was an op-ed article in which he gave his opinions about democracy in Russia.

Your ideas about liberal and conservative are a bit confused. Liberals should be far more outraged by the lack of liberal democracy in Russia than conservatives. Left-wing groups like Amnesty International are the leaders in criticizing Putin, and the New York Times has published editorials harshly criticizing him, including one called ”kicking the corpse of democracy.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/30/opinion/30wed4.html?_r=1&ref=opinion&oref=slogin

You really should be more careful before making such irresponsible statements.

How would YOU like it if someone on this blog published a post about YOU calling you a ”petty criminal” because you’d been arrested while protesting for an end to the war in Iraq. Would you approve of it?
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Martin
Nyc, United States
"Isn’t it rather ironic that the ONLY source Mr. Ivanov has about Mr. Kozlovsky being a ”petty criminal” IS THE WASHINGTON POST ARTICLE ITSELF?... THEN WHY DOES HE BELIEVE THIS STATEMENT ABOUT KOZLOVSKY?..."

Fufloh or flip flop Eugene?
3 Stars
Avadhut
Calicut, India
@Kim......

Craig might be a bit confused about liberals and conservatives when it comes to desiring who runs Russia. Therefore let me suggest something that might appeal to both the liberals and the conservatives about having the perfect government in Russia.

How does the name Liberal Democratic Party of Russia sound headed by a certain leader called Vladimir Zhirinovsky. A far better choice than Vladimir Putin of course, right?

What say Eugene?
4 Stars
Dear Avadhut,

I felt I was done with this post and comments, but you really surprised me. It’s not that often that people outside Russia know what LDPR is and can spell Zhirinovsky’s name.

No, I wouldn’t recommend Zhirinovsky as Putin’s replacement for the same reason I don’t want McCain becoming our next president: too old and too hot-headed.

However, Zhirinovsky isn’t such a clown he’s always portraited in the West. On the contrary, I consider him as one of the most — if not THE most — gifted and experienced Russian politicians, including Putin.

I don’t want to take space for the subject most of the Instablogs readers aren’t really interested in. Sometime ago, I wrote a piece on LDPR for the Johnson’s Russia List:

http://www.cdi.org/russia/johnson/9126-20.cfm

It’s already somewhat outdated, of course, but, hopefully, will give you a sense of what LDPR and Zhirinovsky are all about.

Naturally, feel free to contact me off-line with questions/comments.

Best Regards,
Eugene
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Kim publiuspundit.com/
New York, United States
I’d suggest that one possible choice to replace Putin as ”president” of Russia might have been Putin’s own former prime minister, Mikhail Kasyanov. But Putin disagreed, so he charged him with fraud in collecting signatures for his nomination petition and purged him from the ballot.

I wonder what Americans would say if come this September he has discovered fraud in Barack Obama’s nomination materials and strikes him from the ballot, leaving John McCain to run against Ralph Nader.

Hmmm . . .
(Global Perspectives)
0 Stars
Kim publiuspundit.com/
New York, United States
Instablogs has now deleted Mr. Ivanov’s statement about Mr. Kozlovsky being a ”petty criminal” after an investigation concluded it was irresponsibly false.
1 Stars
It turns out you’re a petty liar Kim.

”If anyone pointed out a factual error in my reporting, I would immediately apologize and correct it.”

http://eivanov.instablogs.com/entry/fufloh-or-how-the-washington-post-covers-russia/#comment-505494

Are you going to apologize and correct?
(Global Perspectives)
3 Stars
Vikas Shekhawat instablogs.com
Churu, Rajasthan, India
We haven’t removed any post or deleted any statement made by Mr. Ivanov from the site, as discussed above. Valuable members of Instablogs have reported abuse with respect to many such propaganda articles. And all members have stressed on the fact that propaganda posts should not reach the homepage. Articles or comments “Reported as Abuse” by considerable number of users might automatically get buried.

Vikas Shekhawat
Editor-in-Chief
Instablogs News Network
3 Stars
Instablogs has now deleted Mr. Ivanov’s statement about Mr. Kozlovsky being a ”petty criminal” after an investigation concluded it was irresponsibly false.

The above statement by member and contributor Kim Zigfeld is absolutely false and baseless. As Shri V. Shekhawat has clarified above, Instablogs shall not encourage propaganda posts by featuring them on the homepage.

Members are requested to refrain from launching personal attacks on other members and contributors. Name calling and abusive language shall not be tolerated at any cost.

Jayanta Bhattacharya
Founding Editor
Instablogs News Network.
0 Stars
Kim publiuspundit.com/
New York, United States
This is the e-mail I got from Vikas today:

I was giving the issue a thorough thought and hence took so much time. I’ll come directly to the point. We’ve removed the stories from the Citizen Voices module wherever the words ’petty criminal’ was used. You were correct from the very beginning.
0 Stars
Kim publiuspundit.com/
New York, United States
Both Mr. Ivanov and Instablogs are subject to being sued by Oleg Kozlovsky and the Washington Post for the two blatant lies contained in this post which neither one has corrected and for which neither one has apologized.

First, that Oleg Kozlovsky is a ”petty criminal.” Vikas has stated I was ”correct from the very beginning” about this.

Second, that Oleg Kozlovsky did not write the column that appeared in the Washington Post.

Both statements are false, and Mr. Ivanov cited no source material to substantiate them. Mr. Ivanov has violated the basic standards of journalism that, ironically, his own post purported to defend.
2 Stars
Let us get the record straight once and for all. Common wisdom suggests that a person convicted of any crime and sentenced in any court of law for whatever offence is a criminal. Shri Eugene Ivanov in one of his comments did clarify why he called Oleg Kozlovsky a petty criminal.

Oleg Kozlovsky has served terms in prison after being found guilty of crimes in Russia, and that is a fact no one can dispute.

Instablogs has no problems whatsoever with the term (petty criminal) used given Shri Eugene’s argument to back it up.

Shri Vikas Shekhawat was absolutely correct when he said that posts might be buried if flagged by members as ’abuse’. This might have been the case here where the concerned post could have been automatically buried by the software. If members so desire, we can provide you the details from the tech team if substantial amount of users reported abuse regarding the post.

Instablogs does not subscribe to one political ideology or other. It is an open social media where every ideology and opinion is accommodated. In that way we are unique, and we are absolutely unashamed of the sin by being proud of this.

I have made it abundantly clear that no propaganda post shall make it to the homepage. I have, today, instructed my worldwide editors with powers to take a story to the homepage to keep a check on such posts making it to the homepage.

By the way, Shri Eugene Ivanov’s post is still in the Citizen Voices section. We have not found it to be abusive, offensive or libelous. Neither we have found the article to be a piece of propaganda.

As far as the risk of being sued by Oleg Kozlovsky is concerned, we shall cross the bridge when we come to it.

We shall never ever tolerate any bullying here. Any such attempt that comes to our notice here will be severely dealt with because it defeats the purpose of the Instablogs dream, which is to make members feel at home.

I have found some comments and posts by some authors to have crossed all levels of decency, and civility. We have taken action before, we are taking action now, and we shall not hesitate to take action in the future.


Jayanta Bhattacharya
Founding Editor
Instablogs News Network.
Add your Comment